Hello. Sign In
Standards Store

ASTM D5102

2009 Edition, October 1, 2009

Complete Document

Standard Test Methods for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Compacted Soil-Lime Mixtures

Includes all amendments and changes through Change/Amendment , October 1, 2009

View Abstract
Product Details
Document History

Detail Summary

Not Active, See comments below

Additional Comments:
Price (USD)
Single User
In Stock
PDF + Print
In Stock
$113.90 You save 15%
Add to Cart

People Also Bought These:

ASTM C1059/C1059M
ASTM E488/E488M
ASTM D2435/D2435M
ASTM C1293

Product Details:

  • Revision: 2009 Edition, October 1, 2009
  • Published Date: October 1, 2009
  • Status: Not Active, See comments below
  • Document Language: English
  • Published By: ASTM International (ASTM)
  • Page Count: 7
  • ANSI Approved: No
  • DoD Adopted: No

Description / Abstract:

This test method covers procedures for preparing, curing, and testing laboratory-compacted specimens of soil-lime and other lime-treated materials (Note 1) for determining unconfined compressive strength. This test method can be used for specimens prepared at the maximum unit weight and optimum water content, or for specimens prepared at other target unit weight and water content levels. Other applications are given in Section 5 on Significance and Use.

NOTE 1—Lime-based products other than commercial quicklime and hydrated lime are also used in the lime treatment of fine-grained cohesive soils. Lime kiln dust (LKD) is collected from the kiln exhaust gases by cyclone, electrostatic, or baghouse-type collection systems. Some lime producers hydrate various blends of LKD plus quicklime to produce a lime-based product.

Cored specimens of soil-lime should be tested in accordance with Test Methods D2166.

Two alternative procedures are provided:

Procedure A describes procedures for preparing and testing compacted soil-lime specimens having height-todiameter ratios between 2.00 and 2.50. This test method provides the standard measure of compressive strength.

Procedure B describes procedures for preparing and testing compacted soil-lime specimens using Test Methods D698 compaction equipment and molds commonly available in most soil testing laboratories. Procedure B is considered to provide relative measures of individual specimens in a suite of test specimens rather than standard compressive strength values. Because of the lesser height-to-diameter ratio (1.15) of the cylinders, compressive strength determined by Procedure B will normally be greater than that by Procedure A.

Results of unconfined compressive strength tests using Procedure B should not be directly compared to those obtained using Procedure A.

All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in Practice D6026.

The method used to specify how data are collected, calculated, or recorded in this standard is not directly related to the accuracy to which the data can be applied in design or other uses, or both. How one applies the results obtained using this standard is beyond its scope.

Lime is not an effective stabilizing agent for all soils. Some soil components such as sulfates, phosphates, organics, etc. can adversely affect soil-lime reactions and may affect the test results using this method.

The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.

The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used when dealing with inch-pound units. In this system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the unit for mass is slugs. The rationalized slug unit is not given, unless dynamic (F = ma) calculations are involved.

It is common practice in the engineering/construction profession to concurrently use pounds to represent both a unit of mass (lbm) and of force (lbf). This implicitly combines two separate systems of units; that is, the absolute system and the gravitational system. It is scientifically undesirable to combine the use of two separate sets of inch-pound units within a single standard. As stated, this standard includes the gravitational system of inch-pound units and does not use/present the slug unit for mass. However, the use of balances or scales recording pounds of mass (lbm) or recording density in lbm/ft3 shall not be regarded as non-conformance with this standard.

This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use. For specific precautionary statements, see Section 8.

*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard.