Hello. Sign In
Standards Store

ASTM E1301

1995 Edition, October 10, 1995

Complete Document

Standard Guide for Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons

Includes all amendments and changes through Reapproval Notice , 2003

View Abstract
Product Details
Document History

Detail Summary

Not Active, See comments below

Additional Comments:
Price (USD)
Single User
In Stock
PDF + Print
In Stock
$122.40 You save 15%
Add to Cart

People Also Bought These:

ASTM A480/A480M
ASTM E230/E230M

Product Details:

  • Revision: 1995 Edition, October 10, 1995
  • Published Date: January 2003
  • Status: Not Active, See comments below
  • Document Language: English
  • Published By: ASTM International (ASTM)
  • Page Count: 13
  • ANSI Approved: Yes
  • DoD Adopted: No

Description / Abstract:

While there are a number of uses for interlaboratory tests, and variations in their design and implementation, it is still possible to specify the essential principles that need to be considered when organizing such tests. Part A of this guide defines those principles and describes the factors that should be taken into account in the organization and conduct of proficiency testing programs.

This guide also covers how laboratory accrediting bodies, which assess technical competence of testing laboratories, should select and use proficiency testing programs (refer to Part B).

Part A of the guide is intended for use by various parties, such as accrediting bodies, regulatory authorities and clients of laboratory services which have a need to assess the technical competence of laboratories. It is also useful for laboratories in self-evaluation, but recognizes that proficiency testing is only one mechanism that can contribute to establishing equivalent confidence among users of different testing laboratories.

It is currently a condition of some accreditation bodies that laboratories participate regularly in "approved" proficiency testing programs. Therefore, it is essential that program operators comply with principles for conduct of professionally managed proficiency programs, both in terms of technical requirements and quality management (see Annex A1 and Annex A2).

The methods of operation within different proficiency testing organizations are not expected to be identical and this guide does not give specific operational details for interlaboratory test comparisons. It does, however, cover both measurement comparison and testing programs in which large numbers of laboratories (over 20) or small groups of laboratories (1 to 20) are tested. Therefore, the contents of this guide are intended only as a framework to be modified appropriately for particular situations.

A list of some relevant references is given in Appendix X1.